コインチェーン

仮想通貨・Web3ニュース・投資・教育情報

South Korea’s FSC Chair Questions Viability of Cryptocurrency Superseding Legal Tender

Jul 27, 2024 #仮想通貨
South Korea’s FSC Chair Questions Viability of Cryptocurrency Superseding Legal Tenderコインチェーン 仮想通貨ニュース

Kim Byung-hwan, nominee for FSC chairmanship, expresses caution about corporations investing in cryptocurrencies. South Korea’s financial authorities are prioritizing financial stability and regulatory review over market development.

Points

  • Kim Byung-hwan expresses caution about corporate investments in cryptocurrencies.
  • Emphasizes financial stability and regulatory review over market development.
  • South Korea’s financial authorities introduce measures to protect users.
  • The focus is on user protection and maintaining market order.

Kim Byung-hwan, nominee for chairmanship of the Financial Services Commission (FSC), has expressed reservations about allowing corporations to invest in cryptocurrencies. This stance was articulated during a confirmation hearing at the National Assembly’s Political Affairs Committee on July 22.

Cautious Approach to Bitcoin ETFs

Kim Byung-hwan, who is likely to succeed FSC Chairman Lee Bok-hyun, addressed the issue in response to a Democratic Party lawmaker’s inquiry. He emphasized the need for investor protection over market development, suggesting a cautious approach to introducing spot Bitcoin ETFs in South Korea. They suggested waiting to observe the results of U.S. actions before making any decisions.

Kim also stated that virtual assets should not be considered as currency or financial products. This news comes amid recent actions by South Korea’s financial security regulator, which introduced measures on July 19 to protect users interacting with virtual asset service providers (VASPs).

Impact on South Korea

South Korea’s financial authorities are prioritizing financial stability and regulatory review over market development. This move differs from the aggressive approaches taken by international regulators. The decision implies that virtual assets are not suitable as underlying assets for ETFs, leading to a ban on new listings and brokerage services.

Officials stress the need for further discussions on regulations, especially regarding the entry and operations of virtual asset providers. Kim summed it up best when he highlighted the need to prioritize user protection and maintaining market order, and first review regulations on entry and business practices of virtual asset operators.

解説

  • Regulatory Focus: South Korea’s cautious approach to cryptocurrency investments and Bitcoin ETFs underscores the importance of regulatory oversight and financial stability.
  • Investor Protection: Emphasizing investor protection over market development highlights the priority placed on safeguarding users and maintaining market integrity.
  • Comparative Analysis: The approach taken by South Korea contrasts with more aggressive international regulatory actions, reflecting different priorities and strategies in handling digital assets.
  • Future Discussions: Ongoing discussions and reviews of regulations regarding virtual asset providers will be crucial in shaping the future landscape of cryptocurrency investments in South Korea.