コインチェーン

仮想通貨・Web3ニュース・投資・教育情報

Crypto.com Error Leads to Theft Charges

Aug 3, 2024 #仮想通貨
Crypto.com Error Leads to Theft Chargesコインチェーン 仮想通貨ニュース

A major error by Crypto.com resulted in a couple facing theft charges after mistakenly receiving and spending $10 million, highlighting the critical importance of addressing financial discrepancies and adhering to legal standards.

Points

  • Crypto.com mistakenly refunded $10 million instead of $100.
  • The couple spent the money on real estate and gifts, leading to legal charges.
  • Legal consequences include jail time and community corrections orders.
  • The incident underscores the importance of promptly addressing financial errors.

In May 2021, Jatinder Singh attempted to deposit $100 into his Crypto.com account using his partner Thevamanogari Manivel’s bank account. Due to a name mismatch, the deposit was rejected. However, a significant error by a Crypto.com employee led to a $10.47 million refund to Manivel’s account, instead of the intended $100.

The error went unnoticed until December 2021 during an internal audit. By then, Singh and Manivel had already spent a significant portion of the money on two homes, two blocks of land in Melbourne, and a $1 million gift to a friend. Singh initially claimed he believed they had won an online raffle.

“By the time the error was discovered, Singh and Manivel had already spent a significant portion of the money,” noted a Crypto.com representative.

Upon discovering the mistake, Crypto.com contacted the Commonwealth Bank, which informed Manivel that she needed to return the funds. Despite suspecting a scam, she transferred $4 million to her Malaysian bank account. In March 2022, police arrested her at Melbourne airport while attempting to board a flight to Malaysia with $11,000 in cash.

Singh pled guilty to the theft of $6.09 million and appeared in the Victorian County Court for a presentence hearing. His lawyer argued that Singh did not fully understand the seriousness of his actions at the time. The prosecution, however, emphasized the opportunistic nature of the crime and called for a jail sentence.

Manivel faced charges of theft and negligently dealing with the proceeds of crime. She pled not guilty, and after spending over six months in custody, the court granted her bail with strict conditions, including surrendering her passport and not attending any points of departure. She was sentenced to 209 days in prison, recognized as already served, and placed on an 18-month community corrections order.

This case highlights the severe consequences of mishandling mistakenly received funds and underscores the importance of promptly addressing financial discrepancies and adhering to legal standards.

解説

  • The Crypto.com error and subsequent legal actions emphasize the critical need for financial vigilance and ethical behavior

when dealing with unexpected financial windfalls.

“This incident underscores the importance of promptly addressing financial discrepancies and adhering to legal and ethical standards when dealing with unexpected financial windfalls,” remarked a legal expert.

The severe legal consequences faced by Singh and Manivel serve as a cautionary tale about the importance of verifying unexpected gains and understanding the legal implications of spending money that does not belong to them. Their actions, including the extravagant spending and attempt to flee the country, further complicated their legal standing and underscored the opportunistic nature of their behavior.

解説

  • The Crypto.com error and subsequent legal actions against Singh and Manivel underscore the critical need for financial vigilance and ethical behavior.
  • Mishandling mistakenly received funds can lead to severe legal repercussions, emphasizing the importance of verifying unexpected financial gains.
  • The case serves as a reminder to promptly address financial discrepancies and adhere to legal standards to avoid similar situations.
  • Understanding the legal implications of such incidents is crucial for maintaining financial integrity and avoiding legal consequences.
  • This case highlights the necessity for companies to implement robust checks and balances to prevent and quickly rectify such errors.