Compound Finance is facing allegations of a governance attack following the passage of proposal 289 and the emergence of a voting bloc known as the “Golden Boys.”
Points
- Proposal 289 passed, increasing COMP allocation to the goldCOMP treasury.
- Allegations of a governance attack by the “Golden Boys.”
- Proposal 290 aims to transfer Compound Governance Timelock Admin to “CommunityMultiSig.”
- Community concerns about control and fund management.
Compound Finance, a decentralized lending and borrowing protocol, is currently embroiled in controversy following the passage of proposal 289. This proposal, backed by the voting bloc known as the “Golden Boys,” increased the allocation of COMP tokens to the goldCOMP treasury from 92,000 to 499,000.
The governance forums had previously warned about potential governance attacks, and now, allegations have surfaced, accusing the “Golden Boys” of trying to seize control over Compound’s funds.
Proposal 290 has been introduced to counteract this by transferring the Compound Governance Timelock Admin to “CommunityMultiSig.” This move aims to prevent future unilateral decisions that could jeopardize the protocol’s integrity.
解説
- Governance attacks involve manipulating the decision-making process of a protocol to gain control over its resources.
- The “Golden Boys” propose using COMP tokens to fund a new treasury, raising concerns about transparency and control.
- Proposal 290 seeks to decentralize control by transferring administrative rights to a community-managed multisig wallet.
- It is crucial for decentralized protocols to maintain transparent and democratic governance to avoid centralization risks.